Digital Marhaens: Soekarno's Thought, Technology, and Generation Z
DOI
10.59017/oratiodirecta.v8i1.119Keywords:
Digital Marhaenism, Soekarno, Platform capitalism, Gig workers, Generation ZAbstract
Digital technology and platform capitalism have transformed economic and political relations while producing new forms of inequality. This conceptual study examines the contemporary relevance of Soekarno's Marhaenism and its relationship to platform workers and Generation Z. It synthesizes literature on Marhaenism, digital labor, algorithmic management, gig-work hazards, and digital activism. The analysis defines digital Marhaens as economically vulnerable actors who may own operational tools such as motorcycles, smartphones, or computers but do not control the platforms, algorithms, data, pricing, or access rules that organize their work. Technology is therefore ambivalent: it expands market access, livelihood options, and public voice while also intensifying dependence, surveillance, work insecurity, and unequal value extraction. Generation Z is positioned as a potential ally because of its familiarity with networked media and digital mobilization, not as a uniformly progressive or homogeneous group. The meeting point between digital Marhaens and Generation Z lies in collective visibility, critical digital literacy, worker organization, and demands for platform accountability. Digital Marhaenism should consequently be understood as a normative framework for technological justice rather than a rejection of technology. Because the study does not collect worker interviews, platform data, or Generation Z survey evidence, its conclusions remain conceptual propositions that require empirical testing in Indonesian platform economies.
References
Adams, Cindy. 1965. Sukarno: An Autobiography as Told to Cindy Adams. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Buissink, A. 2023. The Machine System of Digital Labor Platforms and the Algorithm as Transmitting Mechanism. Rethinking Marxism, 35(1), 8-23. doi: 10.1080/08935696.2022.2159718.
Gandini, Alessandro. 2021. Digital Labour: An Empty Signifier? Media, Culture & Society, 43(2), 369-380. doi: 10.1177/0163443720948018.
Jayatissa, K. A. D. U. 2023. Generation Z: A New Lifeline. A Systematic Literature Review. Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 179-186.
Kaplan, E. B. 2020. The Millennial/Gen Z Leftists Are Emerging: Are Sociologists Ready for Them? Sociological Perspectives, 63(3), 408-427.
Kuswono. 2016. Marhaenism: Social Ideology Created by Sukarno. Historia, 4(2), 119-130. doi: 10.24127/hj.v4i2.549.
Mumtaha, H. A., & H. A. Khoiri. 2019. Analisis Dampak Perkembangan Revolusi Industri 4.0 dan Society 5.0 pada Perilaku Masyarakat Ekonomi. Jurnal Pilar Teknologi, 4(2), 55-60.
Peredy, Z., L. Vigh, W. Quingyu, & J. Muyi. 2024. Analysing Generation Z Communication Attitudes, Values and Norms. Acta Periodica, 30, 4-19.
Pradipta, Muhammad Arya, Abdul Wafi, Marita, Rahmadani Luthfiah, Fariz Ikhsan, & Prawidya Raihan Syafaat. 2024. Cinta Tanah Air pada Era Digital: Peran Generasi Z dalam Mempertahankan Identitas Nasional. Populer, 3(4), 109- 118.
Robin, P., S. Alvin, & T. Hasugian. 2022. Gen-Z Perspective on Politics: High Interest, Uninformed, and Urging Political Education. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 11(3).
Taylor, K., P. Van Dijk, S. Newnam, & D. Sheppard. 2023. Physical and Psychological Hazards in the Gig Economy System: A Systematic Review. Safety Science, 166, 106234. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106234.
Vallas, Steven, & Juliet B. Schor. 2020. What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 273-294.
Wang, Jing, & Julia Tomassetti. 2024. Labor-Capital Relations on Digital Platforms: Organization, Algorithmic Discipline and the Social Factory Again. Sociology Compass, 18(3), e13192.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Novance Silitonga et al.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.