KUHAP 2025 dan Jaminan Due Process of Law: Batas Penangkapan, Penahanan, dan Penyadapan dalam Negara Hukum

Authors

  • Magister Hukum, Universitas Bung Karno, Jakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Magister Hukum, Universitas Bung Karno, Jakarta, Indonesia Author
  • Magister Hukum, Universitas Bung Karno, Jakarta, Indonesia Author

DOI

10.59017/setara.v6i2.578

Keywords:

Criminal Procedure, Due Process, Arrest, Detention, Surveillance

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which Law Number 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code strengthens due process guarantees in Indonesia, particularly in relation to arrest, detention, and surveillance. The issue is legally significant because the new code introduces more explicit procedural safeguards, tighter coordination requirements between investigators and prosecutors, and broader pretrial review, but still leaves surveillance to be further governed by a separate statute. Using normative legal research with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, this article compares the structure of Law Number 20 of 2025 with Law Number 8 of 1981, reads the reform in light of key Constitutional Court decisions, and formulates criteria for assessing whether coercive measures remain compatible with the rule of law. The article argues that the 2025 reform improves legal certainty for arrest and detention through clearer evidentiary thresholds, notification duties, time limits, and remedial consequences, yet the legality of surveillance will remain vulnerable unless an integrated supervisory regime is enacted and aligned with pretrial review.

References

Indonesia. (2025). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Retrieved June 14, 2026, from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/337302/uu-no-20-tahun-2025

Indonesia. (1981). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. Retrieved June 14, 2026, from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/47041/uu-no-8-tahun-1981

Hadiyanto, A. (2025). Urgensi Pembaharuan Kitab Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Menjawab Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Modern di Indonesia. Jurnal USM Law Review, 8(3), 2842-2856. Retrieved June 14, 2026, from https://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/julr/article/view/12820

Sutomo, D. (2023). Lembaga Praperadilan Sebagai Instrumen Pengawasan Horizontal Hakim Dalam Praktik Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Fakta Hukum, 1(2), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.58819/jurnalfaktahukum(jfh).v1i2.65

Subagja, D. A., Tornado, A. S., Ifrani, & Anugerah, M. R. (2021). Penyadapan (Wiretapping) oleh Penyidik dalam Rangka Mengumpul Bukti Menurut Perspektif Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 16(2), 261-281. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v16i2.3426

Downloads

Published

12-12-2025

How to Cite

KUHAP 2025 dan Jaminan Due Process of Law: Batas Penangkapan, Penahanan, dan Penyadapan dalam Negara Hukum. (2025). SETARA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.59017/setara.v6i2.578